This is a difficult one, and I'm not going to pretend it's clean. I'd like to see shorts today — there's a lot of LRL stacked below, plus the Asia and London lows, and that's a genuinely reachable draw to the downside. But like I said yesterday, we're still inside the no-short zone — this is a bullish HTF array, and shorting into it is fighting the higher timeframe. So I'm not forcing a side. The bias is neutral, leaning bearish — and only if the setup is A+. Anything less than A+ here, and the zone wins. Posted before the open, judged after.
Yesterday the rule was hard: no shorts, long or nothing. Today I'm loosening it a notch — but only a notch, and I want to be honest about why. The LRL below is a real draw, and if the market hands me a genuinely A+ short into it — a clean sweep, a proper shift, everything lined up — I'll take it, even inside the zone, because the setup quality earns it. What I will not do is talk myself into a B-grade short because I want one. "I'd like to see shorts" is a want, and wants are exactly what the no-short zone is there to check. So the bar is deliberately high: A+ or I stand aside. On a conflicted day, the setup has to be so clean it overrides the caution — not just clean enough to justify the caution. If I have to argue myself into it, it's already a no.
We hunt liquidity live on Discord every trading day — and the recap gets posted win, lose, or no-trade.